Imagine a solar-powered house where energy independence is a reality. Are you interested in how? As the world moves toward renewable energy households seek new ways to use solar electricity. The best solutions are Franklin Battery and Tesla Powerwall because of the leading revolution in household solar batteries. The FranklinWH aPowerX model makes a formidable rival with advanced technology and great specs that attract energy-conscious customers. Meanwhile, the Tesla Powerwall is famous for its durability and innovative features.
What if you could cut your energy expenditures and carbon footprint? This article will compare the Franklin Battery vs Tesla Powerwall, their specifications which is best for your need, and how they differ in the home energy storage market. We will thoroughly compare their specs and performance data to answer prospective consumers’ worries. I am sure with the help of this researched blog, you choose a battery system that fits your energy demands and lifestyle. Ready for the next energy independence step?
Franklin Battery—How Does It Work?
The Franklin Battery, specifically the FranklinWH aPowerX, is a lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) battery that stores energy in homes. This battery formula is safe as well as lasts a long time, and doesn’t change much when heated or cooled, making it a good choice for home energy systems. The power works by saving extra energy that solar panels make during the day to be used at night or when it’s dark. It works as part of the Franklin Home Power (FHP) system, which includes solar panels and energy control units to offer a complete energy option.
When solar panels produce more energy than a home needs, the extra energy is sent to the power battery to be stored. When there is a high demand for energy or little sun production, the saved energy can be used to power the house. This method not only makes the best use of green energy but also offers backup power in case of power outages also making the country more energy-independent.
Tesla Powerwall—How Does It Work?
The most famous Tesla Powerwall is a household lithium-ion battery that stores solar and grid energy. The newest Powerwall 2 with its elegant form and innovative technologies, is popular with solar users. Like the Franklin Battery, the Powerwall stores solar energy for later use. It may store grid energy for peak hours by drawing it during off-peak hours when power costs are lower. I am sure this function reduces energy expenses and ensures electricity reliability for homes.
The Powerwall’s built-in converter converts solar panel DC power into household AC electricity. With the help of the Tesla app, customers track energy generation and consumption in real-time. Tech-savvy homeowners like the Powerwall’s control and visibility.
Pros and Cons of Tesla Powerwall and Franklin Battery
Pros of Franklin Battery:
- It is highly safe and has a long lifespan, and it has a 100% discharge depth, so it uses all stored energy.
- 10 kW peak power for energy-intensive houses.
- However, a 12-year warranty provides peace of mind.
- Stacks up to 15 units for convenient energy storage expansion.
- Self-installation saves money.
Cons of Franklin Battery:
- Weight and Size: Bulkier than rivals, making installation harder.
- Its brand recognition is lower than that of Tesla since it’s newer.
Pros of Tesla Powerwall:
- Established Brand: Supported by Tesla’s energy innovation and dependability.
- Integrates solar and smart home technologies for energy management.
- 90% round-trip efficiency, 96% discharge depth.
- Lightweight and small, making installation easy in diverse circumstances.
Cons of Tesla Powerwall:
- One drawback is the limited peak power output of 7 kW, which may not be sufficient for bigger homes.
- Professional installation increases costs.
- 10-year warranty, shorter than Franklin Battery.
Specification Comparison of Franklin Vs Tesla
| Feature | FranklinWH power | Tesla Powerwall 2 |
| Peak Power | 10 kW | 7 kW |
| Depth of Discharge (DOD) | 100% | 96% |
| Weight | 408 lbs | 251 lbs (approx.) |
| Size | 750 x 1150 x 290 mm | 1150 x 753 x 147 mm |
| Roundtrip Efficiency | 89% | 90% |
| Battery Type | Lithium Iron Phosphate | Lithium Ion |
| Stackable | Yes, up to 15 units | Yes, up to 10 units |
| Storage Capacity | 13.6 kWh | 13.5 kWh |
| Coupling | AC-coupled | AC-coupled |
| Max Continuous Power | 5 kW | 5 kW |
Comparison Between Franklin Battery vs Tesla Powerwall
A homeowner’s choice between the Franklin Battery and Tesla Powerwall depends on various criteria. Both systems are residential and have similar functions, yet they differ.
1. Battery Chemistry
Safety, thermal stability, and lifespan are hallmarks of the Franklin Battery’s lithium iron phosphate (LFP) technology. This chemistry lasts longer and overheats less than other lithium-ion technologies. In contrast, The Tesla Powerwall uses nickel cobalt aluminum oxide (NCA) chemistry, which has better energy density but a shorter lifetime and higher thermal runaway danger.
2. Storage capacity
The Franklin Battery holds 13.6 kWh and the Tesla Powerwall is 13.5 kWh. While the difference is small, the Franklin Battery’s 10 kW peak power output is beneficial for families with high energy needs, providing more power at peak use periods.
3. Discharge Depth
DOD determines how much stored energy may be used. The Franklin Battery has a 100% DOD thus, users may access all stored energy. The Tesla Powerwall has a DOD of 96% which restricts useable energy and may reduce efficiency for battery-heavy users.
4. Stackability
For homeowners contemplating future energy demands as well as battery stackability is vital. The Franklin Battery can stack up to 15 units, giving bigger houses or those with higher energy needs more options. While stackable, the Tesla Powerwall restricts users to 10 units, which may limit system expansion.
5. Weight and Dimensions
The Franklin Battery weighs 408 lbs, compared to the Tesla Powerwall’s 251 lbs. The lighter Tesla Powerwall is easier to install than the Franklin Battery, which may need stronger mounting.
6. Warranty
As you are aware, warranty coverage is crucial for homes buying energy storage devices. Franklin Battery gives customers a 12-year guarantee because of its durability and performance. Tesla Powerwalls have 10-year warranties. Franklin’s enhanced coverage may appeal to long-term dependability seekers.
7. Smart Home Integration
Advanced integration makes Tesla the leader in smart home technologies. The Tesla app and Powerwall sync to let users track energy consumption, solar output, and battery status. Franklin is functional but lacks smart home partnerships and connections, which may disappoint tech-savvy energy system control consumers.
8. Cost Comparison
Cost is a major consideration when choosing between the Franklin Battery and Tesla Powerwall.
- Battery: The FranklinWH Power costs $10,000–$12,000, including installation. Inverters and energy management systems may increase costs. Since it stacks units, the investment might rise if you need additional storage.
- The Tesla Powerwall 2 costs $10,500 to $12,500, including installation. Adding components or upgrading your solar system may cost more than the built-in inverter.
Both systems provide loans to split the expense. Solar energy storage system initial expenses, energy bill reductions, and local incentives must be considered.
Performance
Franklin Battery and Tesla Powerwall perform well in energy storage.
- Franklin Battery: Ideal for high-energy houses, the Franklin Battery produces 5 kW continuous and 10 kW peak power. Its 100% depth of discharge lets homeowners use all stored energy also making it an effective solar energy manager.
- Tesla Powerwall: The Tesla Powerwall 2’s peak power output is 7 kW. However, its constant power output is 5 kW. A depth of discharge of 96% allows consumers to access most stored energy, although a minor part remains. Energy management is dependable with the Powerwall’s 90% roundtrip efficiency, which makes a lot of stored energy useable.
However, the Franklin Battery and Tesla Powerwall are the best solutions. I am sure you understand which is best for your needs. But if you need customized help, then Get a Quote.
Additional Homeowner Considerations
Both systems cost differently depending on installation and extra components. When comparing options then homeowners should include installation fees.
- Warranty and Support: Franklin, a younger firm, may not have the same customer care and support reputation as Tesla. But, before investing homeowners should investigate warranties and user reviews.
- Solar system integration: The batteries are intended to work with current solar systems. Depending on existing equipment and setups, installing them may be easier.
- Monitoring and Management: As you read, the Tesla Powerwall app lets customers measure energy use in real-time with comprehensive monitoring options. Franklin offers monitoring, but the experience may vary.
Conclusion
Homeowners seeking dependable energy storage can consider the Franklin Battery and Tesla Powerwall. The Franklin Battery’s lithium iron phosphate chemistry makes it safe as well as long-lasting, and deep-dischargeable. Its 10 kW peak power output benefits homes with significant energy needs. However, the Tesla Powerwall is a reliable choice because of its brand recognition and extensive monitoring capabilities. Homeowners, particularly those committed to the Tesla ecosystem prefer the Powerwall for its durability and performance. Now that you know which is best between the Franklin Battery and Tesla Powerwall, take the next step towards energy independence. Get a Quote from us now to find the best energy storage for you!